Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12891 - 12900 of 59025 for quit claim deed.
Search results 12891 - 12900 of 59025 for quit claim deed.
State v. Oto Orlik
of the crime. Orlik filed a postconviction motion, primarily raising claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4195 - 2005-03-31
of the crime. Orlik filed a postconviction motion, primarily raising claims of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. We reject Coleman’s claims and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894664 - 2024-12-26
trial. We reject Coleman’s claims and affirm the judgment and order. ¶2 Following a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894664 - 2024-12-26
The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
condominium development. The complaint alleges two claims: one for declaratory judgment seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4405 - 2005-03-31
condominium development. The complaint alleges two claims: one for declaratory judgment seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4405 - 2005-03-31
Trumpeter Developments, LLC v. Pierce County
Development’s claims against the County.[1] The circuit court determined there was no covered occurrence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6969 - 2005-03-31
Development’s claims against the County.[1] The circuit court determined there was no covered occurrence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6969 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
their claims are barred by a statute of repose, WIS. STAT. § 893.89 (2015-16) 1 . We affirm. ¶2 The Hays
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212535 - 2018-05-10
their claims are barred by a statute of repose, WIS. STAT. § 893.89 (2015-16) 1 . We affirm. ¶2 The Hays
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212535 - 2018-05-10
Traditional Design Works, Ltd. v. John McGourthy, Jr.
). We conclude that the presence of an accord and satisfaction defeats TDW’s claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13064 - 2005-03-31
). We conclude that the presence of an accord and satisfaction defeats TDW’s claim against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13064 - 2005-03-31
Carl Rucker v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.
claims action had been before a court commissioner. He also argues that “[Laidlaw’s] claim[] not to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31
claims action had been before a court commissioner. He also argues that “[Laidlaw’s] claim[] not to have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2861 - 2005-03-31
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
). With the exception of evidence which Marcum claims was newly discovered and with regard to which trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8065 - 2005-03-31
). With the exception of evidence which Marcum claims was newly discovered and with regard to which trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8065 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
be vacated and the charge dismissed. He also claims that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
be vacated and the charge dismissed. He also claims that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77723 - 2012-02-07
Diane D. Bell v. Midas-Lin Co., Ltd.
. Midas-Lin argues that the court “erred in ordering ‘all rights, claims or causes of action’ between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14535 - 2005-03-31
. Midas-Lin argues that the court “erred in ordering ‘all rights, claims or causes of action’ between
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14535 - 2005-03-31