Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12891 - 12900 of 63981 for records/1000.

[PDF] Theresa L. C. v. Jeremy C. P.
at visitation should preclude a finding that he did not visit or communicate with Talya. ¶3 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7084 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit appears. The jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144354 - 2015-07-13

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
consideration of the no-merit report and response and our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99721 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gisella Wood v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
that there was insufficient credible evidence in the record to support LIRC's decision. Because the trial court correctly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8441 - 2017-09-19

City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
, the record had been remanded to the municipal court. Vernon appealed, and we concluded that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16113 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carlos Lucho Phillips
that this possible issue lacks merit. Based upon our independent review of the record, including the letter, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7963 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=721839 - 2023-10-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Appellate counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718645 - 2023-10-23

CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues. Therefore, we summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112693 - 2014-05-15

COURT OF APPEALS
is presumed to have acted reasonably and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30481 - 2007-10-02