Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12891 - 12900 of 82995 for simple case search.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of the case, which were aggravated by Sturm’s criminal record, the sentence imposed does not “shock public
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194889 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] City of Eau Claire v. Kimberly M. Langenfeld
... against unreasonable searches and seizures.” UNITED STATES CONST. AMEND. IV. In Terry v. Ohio, 392
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3628 - 2017-09-19

State v. Christopher L. Ware
. One officer conducted a pat-down search of Ware and the officers accompanied Ware through the rear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14904 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to the case law, it is the essence of good police work for [the officer] to freeze the situation until she can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40563 - 2009-09-08

State v. Belinda C. Wolf
their lawful duties, which in this case were the execution of a bench warrant for her arrest.” Wolf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2100 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, section 11 of the Wisconsin Constitution prohibit unreasonable searches and seizures. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484561 - 2022-02-15

City of Eau Claire v. Kimberly M. Langenfeld
The Fourth Amendment protects “[t]he right of the people ... against unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3628 - 2005-03-31

State v. Kenneth E. Hanson
. If they are not, we will accept those facts. Id. But, whether a search or seizure passes constitutional muster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11151 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Jerry D. Gragg
. 1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2003-04). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Elizabeth M. Gibson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
duty to search the record for credible evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict, not for evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11026 - 2017-09-19