Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12891 - 12900 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 12891 - 12900 of 58483 for speedy trial.
State v. Oto Orlik
. Oto Orlik appeals a trial court order that prohibited him from having contact with his wife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
. Oto Orlik appeals a trial court order that prohibited him from having contact with his wife
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14570 - 2005-03-31
Russell K. Whitford v. Karen L. Whitford
the trial court’s order that requires him to pay $750 per month maintenance to his former wife, Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15199 - 2005-03-31
the trial court’s order that requires him to pay $750 per month maintenance to his former wife, Karen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15199 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael D. Lawrence v. American Family Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
also contends that he was “unduly prejudiced” and is entitled to a new trial because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12643 - 2017-09-21
also contends that he was “unduly prejudiced” and is entitled to a new trial because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12643 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas D. Myers
postconviction motion for a new trial.1 On appeal, Myers challenges the voluntariness of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10115 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion for a new trial.1 On appeal, Myers challenges the voluntariness of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10115 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
raises three claims on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
raises three claims on appeal: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion at sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34788 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Drexler
2 to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02). 2 Drexler argues that the trial court, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5262 - 2017-09-19
2 to WIS. STAT. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02). 2 Drexler argues that the trial court, which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5262 - 2017-09-19
State v. Keith Schroeder
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31
that the terminology might come up at trial. Second, there was no Fourth Amendment violation in the crime lab’s search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15926 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas A. Drexler
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02).[2] Drexler argues that the trial court, which adjudicated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5262 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a) (2001-02).[2] Drexler argues that the trial court, which adjudicated his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5262 - 2005-03-31
Jerry J. Garceau v. Brenda S. Garceau
to termination and the number of years the agent has been with the company at the time of termination. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14776 - 2005-03-31
to termination and the number of years the agent has been with the company at the time of termination. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14776 - 2005-03-31
Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
Compensation Fund (collectively MPC). At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12663 - 2005-03-31
Compensation Fund (collectively MPC). At the close of the evidence, the trial court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12663 - 2005-03-31