Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1291 - 1300 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.

Marcie Elene Miller v. Paul Gregory Miller
stipulated to joint custody and a physical placement schedule which results in the child’s placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14597 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upstairs neighbor, causing the neighbor to “fear for her safety.” When Lee was taken into custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667500 - 2023-06-14

State v. Sheila McK.
in May of 1997. According to the testimony of Aundre’s social worker, Aundre was taken into custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20309 - 2007-06-04

[PDF] Marcie Elene Miller v. Paul Gregory Miller
. The parties’ one child was born in 1993. The parties stipulated to joint custody and a physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14597 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Holly E. Reyniers v. Lance A. Reyniers
and put into both their names as joint tenants. The parties stipulated to certain custody provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13172 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 152
Title of Case: In re the marriage of: Debra S. Meyer , p/k/a Debra Teasdale, Joint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40925 - 2009-10-27

[PDF] WI APP 152
, JOINT-PETITIONER, V. CLAY TEASDALE, JOINT-PETITIONER-APPELLANT, MARINETTE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40925 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FA-4181VA; Motion and Declaration in Support of Warrant
FA-4181VA, 09/24 Motion and Declaration in Support of Warrant Chapter 785, §§818.01(2), 818.02
/formdisplay/FA-4181VA.pdf?formNumber=FA-4181VA&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2025-02-28

Condor Energy, Inc. v. Richard A. Malone
recovery it had sought, following the court’s consideration of cross-motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3854 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Condor Energy, Inc. v. Richard A. Malone
it had sought, following the court’s consideration of cross-motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3854 - 2017-09-20