Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1291 - 1300 of 29823 for des.

Tower Insurance Company, Inc. v. Cindy Chang
not reach their immunity argument. We review the trial court’s summary judgment de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14907 - 2005-03-31

State v. Charles Jasper, Jr.
we review de novo. Id. “[I]f the defendant fails to allege sufficient facts in his motion to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2440 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Department of Human Services v. Terrance M.
, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Walsh of Walsh & Walsh, S.C., of De Pere. 2005 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7643 - 2013-10-08

Northwest Properties v. Outagamie County
court for Outagamie County: John A. Des Jardins, Judge. Reversed. Before Cane
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13397 - 2005-03-31

Cindy Schultz v. Victoria Wellens
of statutory interpretation. We review a trial court's statutory interpretation de novo. Kwiatkowski v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10372 - 2011-07-07

[PDF] NOTICE
for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed and cause remanded with directions. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30501 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to uncontested facts is a question of law that I review de novo. State v. Rydeski, 214 Wis. 2d 101, 106, 571
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106102 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 125
, due weight deference and de novo review”). Even though the circuit court gave the Commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28539 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Gary B. Larsen v. Karen S. Larsen
at the 1 Gary also moved to modify maintenance on the grounds that Karen was involved in a de facto
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10673 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Lakisha Dahm v. City of Milwaukee
, is entitled to the pension. As noted, the trial court disagreed. II. ¶4 We review de novo a trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20310 - 2017-09-21