Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1291 - 1300 of 6143 for li.
Search results 1291 - 1300 of 6143 for li.
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
in the no merit report: whether the trial court misused its sentencing discretion. Sentencing lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
in the no merit report: whether the trial court misused its sentencing discretion. Sentencing lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
in the no merit report: whether the trial court misused its sentencing discretion. Sentencing lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12419 - 2017-09-21
in the no merit report: whether the trial court misused its sentencing discretion. Sentencing lies within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12419 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
evidence that the injury actually occurred on December 28, 2004. Aurora asserts that Thoms lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35746 - 2009-03-04
evidence that the injury actually occurred on December 28, 2004. Aurora asserts that Thoms lied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35746 - 2009-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
factor at sentencing. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion. See State v. Echols, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104267 - 2013-11-12
factor at sentencing. Sentencing lies within the circuit court’s discretion. See State v. Echols, 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104267 - 2013-11-12
James Kasieta v. James Tennies
The Kasietas’ lot lies just west of the Tennies’ lot, with a boundary line in part running ninety-six feet due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3398 - 2005-03-31
The Kasietas’ lot lies just west of the Tennies’ lot, with a boundary line in part running ninety-six feet due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3398 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of a witness who lied. Bennett may disagree with that witness’s testimony, and that witness may have earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113196 - 2014-05-28
of a witness who lied. Bennett may disagree with that witness’s testimony, and that witness may have earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113196 - 2014-05-28
James A. Mathes v. ANR Pipeline Company
. ¶5 The Matheses respond that their action lies under Wis. Stat. § 32.06(5), part of the direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2611 - 2005-03-31
. ¶5 The Matheses respond that their action lies under Wis. Stat. § 32.06(5), part of the direct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2611 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott J. Bogdala
had on the victims without support for that assumption in the record. We disagree. Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6333 - 2005-03-31
had on the victims without support for that assumption in the record. We disagree. Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6333 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and prosecuted if he deliberately lied. See § 946.41 (2009-10). There is also no reason to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66848 - 2011-06-27
and prosecuted if he deliberately lied. See § 946.41 (2009-10). There is also no reason to conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66848 - 2011-06-27
State v. Joshua F.D.
juvenile adjudication lies within the sound discretion of the court. State v. James P., 180 Wis.2d 677
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9615 - 2005-03-31
juvenile adjudication lies within the sound discretion of the court. State v. James P., 180 Wis.2d 677
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9615 - 2005-03-31