Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12901 - 12910 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 12901 - 12910 of 63981 for records/1000.
CA Blank Order
response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues that would have arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96392 - 2013-05-07
response, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues that would have arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96392 - 2013-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Appellate counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718645 - 2023-10-23
. Appellate counsel filed a supplemental no-merit report. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718645 - 2023-10-23
CA Blank Order
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136865 - 2015-03-10
a response, and has elected not to do so. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136865 - 2015-03-10
[PDF]
State v. Benjamin M.B.
in the record to support the circuit court's finding that waiver into adult court was proper. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10559 - 2017-09-20
in the record to support the circuit court's finding that waiver into adult court was proper. We therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10559 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial court in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30481 - 2014-09-15
unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial court in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30481 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705857 - 2023-09-26
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=705857 - 2023-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and entitle him to immediate release from custody. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
and entitle him to immediate release from custody. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909757 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Perry was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117321 - 2017-09-21
. Perry was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117321 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record, we 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170707 - 2017-09-21
and conducting an independent review of the record, we 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170707 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to file a response, but did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639153 - 2023-04-04
of his right to file a response, but did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=639153 - 2023-04-04