Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12901 - 12910 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 12901 - 12910 of 83820 for simple case search/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 102.23(6).[1] Our role on appeal is to search the record for evidence supporting the Commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36543 - 2009-05-20
. § 102.23(6).[1] Our role on appeal is to search the record for evidence supporting the Commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36543 - 2009-05-20
State v. Rita A. Whitish
the dome light but Officer Buchholtz put her in the backseat of the patrol car and searched her car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9087 - 2005-03-31
the dome light but Officer Buchholtz put her in the backseat of the patrol car and searched her car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9087 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained a search warrant for Keys’ residence. Officer Jason Katers testified that, during the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70353 - 2014-09-15
obtained a search warrant for Keys’ residence. Officer Jason Katers testified that, during the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Willie L. Bland
searched 2 Bland and found him in possession of a crack pipe. The State subsequently charged Bland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11321 - 2017-09-19
searched 2 Bland and found him in possession of a crack pipe. The State subsequently charged Bland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11321 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV. In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 (1968), the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27131 - 2006-11-14
searches and seizures. U.S. Const. amend. IV. In Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 (1968), the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27131 - 2006-11-14
State v. Mark A. Sturm
and the officer therefore violated Sturm’s right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
and the officer therefore violated Sturm’s right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph L. Egerson
guarantee citizens the right to be free from “unreasonable searches and seizures.” See State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13606 - 2005-03-31
guarantee citizens the right to be free from “unreasonable searches and seizures.” See State v. Richardson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13606 - 2005-03-31
State v. Willie L. Bland
stop, the officer searched[2] Bland and found him in possession of a crack pipe. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11321 - 2005-03-31
stop, the officer searched[2] Bland and found him in possession of a crack pipe. The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11321 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and computer pursuant to search warrants that further supported the jury’s finding of Eichstaedt’s guilt. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894535 - 2024-12-26
and computer pursuant to search warrants that further supported the jury’s finding of Eichstaedt’s guilt. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894535 - 2024-12-26
COURT OF APPEALS
a warrant to search his room, where they found marijuana, cocaine residue, and drug paraphernalia. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43528 - 2009-11-16
a warrant to search his room, where they found marijuana, cocaine residue, and drug paraphernalia. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43528 - 2009-11-16