Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12911 - 12920 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12911 - 12920 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
Frontsheet
137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31515 - 2008-01-15
137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31515 - 2008-01-15
State v. Johnny M. Lacy
has been violated is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
has been violated is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law, which are reviewed de novo. See State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44852 - 2009-12-22
are questions of law, which are reviewed de novo. See State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44852 - 2009-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s performance was deficient or prejudicial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=529907 - 2022-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation and application are questions of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. Andersen v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86384 - 2014-09-15
interpretation and application are questions of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. Andersen v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Balliette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140563 - 2017-09-21
to entitle him to an evidentiary hearing is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Balliette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 197
it to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79, ¶12, 244
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26528 - 2014-09-15
it to undisputed facts presents a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79, ¶12, 244
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26528 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Shaun A. Costello
that we review de novo. See State v. Wodenjak, 2001 WI App 216, ¶5, No. 00-3419-CR. ¶9 Our recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3572 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo. See State v. Wodenjak, 2001 WI App 216, ¶5, No. 00-3419-CR. ¶9 Our recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3572 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Timothy L. Olson
is entitled to sentence credit is an issue we consider de novo. See State v. Seeley, 212 Wis.2d 75, 81, 567
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14052 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to sentence credit is an issue we consider de novo. See State v. Seeley, 212 Wis.2d 75, 81, 567
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14052 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the premises, contract interpretation presents a question of law, which I review de novo. See Town Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173629 - 2017-09-21
of the premises, contract interpretation presents a question of law, which I review de novo. See Town Bank v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173629 - 2017-09-21