Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12911 - 12920 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 12911 - 12920 of 63951 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record, we 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136511 - 2017-09-21
and conducting an independent review of the record, we 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136511 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for adverse possession after 1971; and (3) to open the evidentiary record to show no notice was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33850 - 2014-09-15
for adverse possession after 1971; and (3) to open the evidentiary record to show no notice was recorded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33850 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to identify facts outside the record that might affect the validity of his pleas and whether there is any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119821 - 2014-09-15
to identify facts outside the record that might affect the validity of his pleas and whether there is any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119821 - 2014-09-15
Dale A. Grant v. Marinette County Zoning Board of Adjustment
adopted the administrator’s definition of a privacy fence, which he read into the record at the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19105 - 2005-07-25
adopted the administrator’s definition of a privacy fence, which he read into the record at the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19105 - 2005-07-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial court in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30481 - 2014-09-15
unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered by the trial court in sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30481 - 2014-09-15
State v. Marvin D. Doyle
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9463 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9463 - 2005-03-31
State v. James D. Curtis
that are not clear in the record, Judge Kremers did preside over the trial. The jury convicted Curtis of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
that are not clear in the record, Judge Kremers did preside over the trial. The jury convicted Curtis of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
) failing to require the State to place its sentencing recommendation on the record before accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35190 - 2014-09-15
) failing to require the State to place its sentencing recommendation on the record before accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35190 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Vandenheuvel
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26351 - 2017-09-21
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183295 - 2017-09-21
an independent review of the record, we conclude that 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183295 - 2017-09-21