Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12921 - 12930 of 92560 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) Pintu Baja 1 Set Guguak Lima Puluh Kota.

Ramiro Estrada v. State
. The State subpoenaed the videotape pursuant to § 968.135, Stats.,[1] and the Estradas responded by moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Richard G. Bedessem v. Donna J. Bedessem
to retroactively apply the maintenance increase to the date of the original divorce judgment.1 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14034 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
: THOMAS E. LISTER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83314 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Shawn H.
with directions. ROGGENSACK, J.1 Shawn H. appeals a non-final order waiving juvenile court jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12717 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, JJ. ¶1 DONALD, J. Brian A. Patterson, pro se, appeals the summary judgment order dismissing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252322 - 2020-01-14

[PDF] State v. Jose Lomeli-Lozano
, Curley and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jose Lomeli-Lozano pled guilty to two counts of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20800 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Arlene Arnold v. David Arnold
Anderson, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ. ¶1 BROWN, J. David Arnold appeals from a custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6578 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Town of Wautoma v. City of Wautoma
of two methods of annexation set forth in § 66.021(2), STATS., as follows: [T]erritory contiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12026 - 2017-09-21

State v. Shawn H.
and cause remanded with directions. ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Shawn H. appeals a non-final
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12717 - 2005-03-31

Rebecca J. Atwood v. Robert E. Atwood
of suspension by the family court commissioner. Robert argues on appeal that the trial court erred in: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12927 - 2005-03-31