Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12931 - 12940 of 39047 for probate forms.
Search results 12931 - 12940 of 39047 for probate forms.
State v. Tashonia B.
court misused its discretion in rejecting probation and imposing the placement required by § 48.366(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12320 - 2005-03-31
court misused its discretion in rejecting probation and imposing the placement required by § 48.366(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12320 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Tashonia B.
in rejecting probation and imposing the placement required by § 48.366(1)(a)1, STATS. Concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12320 - 2017-09-21
in rejecting probation and imposing the placement required by § 48.366(1)(a)1, STATS. Concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12320 - 2017-09-21
State v. Glen P. Walker
of probation or parole. The trial court denied the motion without a hearing because: (1) Walker failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12515 - 2005-03-31
of probation or parole. The trial court denied the motion without a hearing because: (1) Walker failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12515 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Andrew L. Hunsick
convicted. On October 23, 2000, sentence was withheld with Attorney Hunsick placed on probation for 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16505 - 2005-03-31
convicted. On October 23, 2000, sentence was withheld with Attorney Hunsick placed on probation for 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16505 - 2005-03-31
State v. Henry James Brookshire
a twenty-year sentence, and placed Brookshire on eighteen years of probation to be served consecutively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18298 - 2005-05-31
a twenty-year sentence, and placed Brookshire on eighteen years of probation to be served consecutively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18298 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of this subsection is 5 years. If the court places the person on probation or imposes a sentence less than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59173 - 2014-09-15
of this subsection is 5 years. If the court places the person on probation or imposes a sentence less than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59173 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sophie Felckowski v. Herman Felckowski
. Sophie Felckowski appeals from orders admitting Benedict Felckowski’s will to probate and determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14012 - 2014-09-15
. Sophie Felckowski appeals from orders admitting Benedict Felckowski’s will to probate and determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14012 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ probation. The no-merit report addresses potential issues regarding suppression of evidence; jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256287 - 2020-03-17
’ probation. The no-merit report addresses potential issues regarding suppression of evidence; jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256287 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
withheld sentence and imposed three years’ probation with 330 days’ jail as a condition. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274569 - 2020-08-04
withheld sentence and imposed three years’ probation with 330 days’ jail as a condition. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274569 - 2020-08-04
State v. William J. Foley
of incarceration coupled with four years of probation. On August 28, 1998, Foley filed with the court a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15754 - 2005-03-31
of incarceration coupled with four years of probation. On August 28, 1998, Foley filed with the court a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15754 - 2005-03-31