Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12931 - 12940 of 63951 for records/1000.
Search results 12931 - 12940 of 63951 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
, on attaining 17 years of age, petition the court to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60478 - 2011-02-28
, on attaining 17 years of age, petition the court to expunge the court’s record of the juvenile’s adjudication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60478 - 2011-02-28
State v. Marvin D. Doyle
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9463 - 2005-03-31
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude that there is no arguable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9463 - 2005-03-31
State v. James D. Curtis
that are not clear in the record, Judge Kremers did preside over the trial. The jury convicted Curtis of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
that are not clear in the record, Judge Kremers did preside over the trial. The jury convicted Curtis of three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
) failing to require the State to place its sentencing recommendation on the record before accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35190 - 2014-09-15
) failing to require the State to place its sentencing recommendation on the record before accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35190 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Vandenheuvel
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26351 - 2017-09-21
. That is, it is an erroneous exercise of discretion for the circuit court to base its decision on facts not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the record, we conclude that 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183295 - 2017-09-21
an independent review of the record, we conclude that 1 All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183295 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as No. 2018AP1148-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252639 - 2020-01-22
of the record as No. 2018AP1148-CRNM 2 mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252639 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245457 - 2019-08-19
of these submissions and an independent review of the record, the judgment is summarily affirmed because we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245457 - 2019-08-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155858 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155858 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182367 - 2017-09-21
). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182367 - 2017-09-21