Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12941 - 12950 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12941 - 12950 of 30126 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
statute was proper is based on a de novo review. State v. Anderson, 141 Wis.2d 653, 658, 416 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11605 - 2017-09-19
statute was proper is based on a de novo review. State v. Anderson, 141 Wis.2d 653, 658, 416 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John W. Moore
to a legal defense is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bantz v. Montgomery Estates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11607 - 2017-09-19
to a legal defense is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bantz v. Montgomery Estates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11607 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
reach. Id. We review de novo whether exclusion of evidence implicates a defendant’s constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110702 - 2014-04-21
reach. Id. We review de novo whether exclusion of evidence implicates a defendant’s constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110702 - 2014-04-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probability of a different trial result exists is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Miller contends that he “should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11
probability of a different trial result exists is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Miller contends that he “should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
sufficient representation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Smith, 207 Wis. 2d at 266-67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89675 - 2012-11-26
sufficient representation is a question of law that we decide de novo. Smith, 207 Wis. 2d at 266-67
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89675 - 2012-11-26
State v. Willie S. Gray, Jr.
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However, if the motion fails to allege
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14056 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Jones
a defendant’s right of confrontation is implicated, we review de novo whether admitting the hearsay statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
a defendant’s right of confrontation is implicated, we review de novo whether admitting the hearsay statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce D. Dybdal
, § 946.42, Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12334 - 2005-03-31
, § 946.42, Stats. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12334 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102328 - 2017-09-21
stop, however, is a question of law for de novo review. Id. The question of what constitutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102328 - 2017-09-21
Ramiro Estrada v. State
of law de novo. See Michael A.P. v. Solsrud, 178 Wis.2d 137, 148, 502 N.W.2d 918, 923 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31
of law de novo. See Michael A.P. v. Solsrud, 178 Wis.2d 137, 148, 502 N.W.2d 918, 923 (Ct. App. 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14691 - 2005-03-31