Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12951 - 12960 of 68499 for j o e y.
Search results 12951 - 12960 of 68499 for j o e y.
State v. Marion Jones
. The informant insisted that Jones was the one carrying the drugs and she told Officer Ederesinghe that, “[y]ou’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15022 - 2005-03-31
. The informant insisted that Jones was the one carrying the drugs and she told Officer Ederesinghe that, “[y]ou’d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15022 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
],” and “[b]y pure coincidence, Douglas knew who [Edwards] was.” Further, Edwards says that Workman’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22
],” and “[b]y pure coincidence, Douglas knew who [Edwards] was.” Further, Edwards says that Workman’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378442 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
offense, did not violate due process). “[B]y tolerating and encouraging the negotiation of pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89383 - 2014-09-15
offense, did not violate due process). “[B]y tolerating and encouraging the negotiation of pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89383 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
plea to lesser offense, did not violate due process). “[B]y tolerating and encouraging the negotiation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89383 - 2013-05-20
plea to lesser offense, did not violate due process). “[B]y tolerating and encouraging the negotiation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89383 - 2013-05-20
State v. Jessie N. Pearson
for an adjournment was denied with the trial court commenting, “[Y]ou can’t have it both ways in terms of demanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31
for an adjournment was denied with the trial court commenting, “[Y]ou can’t have it both ways in terms of demanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
perverse is also rejected. The jury is the arbiter of guilt or not guilt[y] in these cases. The [c]ourt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211718 - 2018-05-01
perverse is also rejected. The jury is the arbiter of guilt or not guilt[y] in these cases. The [c]ourt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211718 - 2018-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
committed the crimes on July 4th[,] 2008. ¶24 We explained in Terrance J.W. that “[b]y its nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149595 - 2017-09-21
committed the crimes on July 4th[,] 2008. ¶24 We explained in Terrance J.W. that “[b]y its nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the contract to the effect that, “Seller agrees that lots w, x, y, and z are merged for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81647 - 2014-09-15
in the contract to the effect that, “Seller agrees that lots w, x, y, and z are merged for purposes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81647 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to trial and used the expert to “nullif[y] the impact of the [other acts] evidence.” This suggestion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101510 - 2017-09-21
to trial and used the expert to “nullif[y] the impact of the [other acts] evidence.” This suggestion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101510 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
but they do not trade or share underwear. The prosecutor continued: [Y]ou certainly don’t wear [underwear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939152 - 2025-04-09
but they do not trade or share underwear. The prosecutor continued: [Y]ou certainly don’t wear [underwear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939152 - 2025-04-09