Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12951 - 12960 of 58472 for o j.
Search results 12951 - 12960 of 58472 for o j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[her] anus.”4 A.S. testified that she was “screaming” and “[o]n a level of one to 10,” the pain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380172 - 2021-06-22
[her] anus.”4 A.S. testified that she was “screaming” and “[o]n a level of one to 10,” the pain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380172 - 2021-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
]o authority known to Latorre states that the factual allegations in the Post-Conviction Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101361 - 2017-09-21
]o authority known to Latorre states that the factual allegations in the Post-Conviction Motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Donna Court apartment and that “[o]ne .40 caliber Smith & Wesson casing” was recovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125969 - 2017-09-21
Donna Court apartment and that “[o]ne .40 caliber Smith & Wesson casing” was recovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125969 - 2017-09-21
State v. John Henry Balsewicz
decision. Id. at ¶44 (citations and footnotes omitted). ¶15 “In Wisconsin, ‘[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5253 - 2005-03-31
decision. Id. at ¶44 (citations and footnotes omitted). ¶15 “In Wisconsin, ‘[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5253 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
97, ¶49, 343 Wis. 2d 157, 822 N.W.2d 79 (“[O]nce an accused invokes his right to counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591673 - 2022-11-22
97, ¶49, 343 Wis. 2d 157, 822 N.W.2d 79 (“[O]nce an accused invokes his right to counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591673 - 2022-11-22
COURT OF APPEALS
of the child.” Roger D. H. v. Virginia O., 2002 WI App 35, ¶19, 250 Wis. 2d 747, 641 N.W.2d 440. ¶20 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147251 - 2015-08-26
of the child.” Roger D. H. v. Virginia O., 2002 WI App 35, ¶19, 250 Wis. 2d 747, 641 N.W.2d 440. ¶20 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147251 - 2015-08-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony would have contradicted officers’ testimony, “[n]o affidavit from Honeycutt exists to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
testimony would have contradicted officers’ testimony, “[n]o affidavit from Honeycutt exists to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179029 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was insufficient to establish that he is dangerous.5 Specifically, M.J.M. argues that “[n]o evidence of recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375235 - 2021-06-09
was insufficient to establish that he is dangerous.5 Specifically, M.J.M. argues that “[n]o evidence of recent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375235 - 2021-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” § 2C.65 states in relevant part: [o]bstructions not actually within the roadway are sometimes so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197369 - 2017-10-03
,” § 2C.65 states in relevant part: [o]bstructions not actually within the roadway are sometimes so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197369 - 2017-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, sir, Your Honor, I do.” The court then asked Sutrick’s trial attorney, “[D]o you agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11
, sir, Your Honor, I do.” The court then asked Sutrick’s trial attorney, “[D]o you agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912792 - 2025-02-11