Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12951 - 12960 of 20304 for sai.
Search results 12951 - 12960 of 20304 for sai.
COURT OF APPEALS
about the conviction is not attributable to the NCIC report and the detective was wrong to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85239 - 2012-07-24
about the conviction is not attributable to the NCIC report and the detective was wrong to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85239 - 2012-07-24
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
of the refrigerator would stop and say, “Hi.” Being relegated to a spot in the kitchen actually turned out
/news/thirdbranch/apr22/bousquet.htm - 2026-01-01
of the refrigerator would stop and say, “Hi.” Being relegated to a spot in the kitchen actually turned out
/news/thirdbranch/apr22/bousquet.htm - 2026-01-01
COURT OF APPEALS
car door, he never heard Lohman say anything that would indicate he was intoxicated, and, in the few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
car door, he never heard Lohman say anything that would indicate he was intoxicated, and, in the few
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33044 - 2008-06-16
Loretta M. Gilmeister v. Eugene Zdroik & Sons, Inc.
this is not a reasonable construction of the statute. ¶17 This is not to say that Ag Services has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
this is not a reasonable construction of the statute. ¶17 This is not to say that Ag Services has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2119 - 2005-03-31
State v. Antonio D. Taborn
heard Taborn say to the rival gang member that “we’ll get all you.” The deputy characterized the remark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13675 - 2013-10-22
heard Taborn say to the rival gang member that “we’ll get all you.” The deputy characterized the remark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13675 - 2013-10-22
State v. Mel Scott Regazzi
unless otherwise noted. [2] Admittedly, had the facts developed differently, say, for instance, Chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6643 - 2005-03-31
unless otherwise noted. [2] Admittedly, had the facts developed differently, say, for instance, Chief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6643 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
jump up and say those aren’t mine, there’s no special notation. And the correction officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30621 - 2005-03-31
jump up and say those aren’t mine, there’s no special notation. And the correction officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30621 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
again laid out the history of the case, and concluded by saying the first judge’s prior probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62849 - 2011-04-13
again laid out the history of the case, and concluded by saying the first judge’s prior probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62849 - 2011-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The purpose of Terry and what Terry really says is you’ve got to take a view of the common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
. The purpose of Terry and what Terry really says is you’ve got to take a view of the common sense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 44
., 249 Wis. 2d 492, ¶49 (third and fourth alterations in Williams). The prosecutor then when on to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46888 - 2014-09-15
., 249 Wis. 2d 492, ¶49 (third and fourth alterations in Williams). The prosecutor then when on to say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46888 - 2014-09-15