Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12961 - 12970 of 72987 for we.
Search results 12961 - 12970 of 72987 for we.
[PDF]
State v. Alfonso Taylor
to convict, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On March 24, 2000, Jonathon Booth, Taylor’s cousin, was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5437 - 2017-09-19
to convict, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 On March 24, 2000, Jonathon Booth, Taylor’s cousin, was involved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5437 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael R. Cooper
to memory problems, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in several respects. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5586 - 2005-03-31
to memory problems, and that he was denied effective assistance of counsel in several respects. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5586 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel L. Sarauer v. Robin C. Sarauer
property settlement which Robin had entered into with her former husband, Daniel. We uphold the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12421 - 2017-09-21
property settlement which Robin had entered into with her former husband, Daniel. We uphold the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12421 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Harris v. Lynelle S. Turenske
not erroneously exercise its discretion in awarding attorney's fees, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND In June 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9650 - 2017-09-19
not erroneously exercise its discretion in awarding attorney's fees, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND In June 1993
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9650 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Duane E. Elm
behalf. Because we conclude the physician's No. 94-0930-CR -2- statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
behalf. Because we conclude the physician's No. 94-0930-CR -2- statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. For the reasons that follow, we reject Mellen’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State charged Mellen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030935 - 2025-11-05
. For the reasons that follow, we reject Mellen’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The State charged Mellen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030935 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreement. We conclude that there was a sufficient factual basis to establish that Popke acted with utter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15
agreement. We conclude that there was a sufficient factual basis to establish that Popke acted with utter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15
State v. William H. Warren
on new information that he had been bothered by the effects of a stroke during the trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9982 - 2005-03-31
on new information that he had been bothered by the effects of a stroke during the trial. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9982 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report, response, and supplemental no-merit reports, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225845 - 2018-10-30
report, response, and supplemental no-merit reports, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225845 - 2018-10-30
State v. William P. Haessly
on a defective verdict. Because we resolve each issue in favor of upholding the judgment and order, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31
on a defective verdict. Because we resolve each issue in favor of upholding the judgment and order, we affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6139 - 2005-03-31