Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12971 - 12980 of 30115 for de.
Search results 12971 - 12980 of 30115 for de.
Margaret Lamkin v. St. Croix County
and dismissed her complaint. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. We apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31
and dismissed her complaint. Our review of summary judgment is de novo. We apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10088 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional requirement for performing a protective search is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
the constitutional requirement for performing a protective search is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
under a de novo standard of review. See State v. Hajicek, 2001 WI 3, ¶15, 240 Wis. 2d 349, 620 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132458 - 2017-09-21
under a de novo standard of review. See State v. Hajicek, 2001 WI 3, ¶15, 240 Wis. 2d 349, 620 N.W.2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132458 - 2017-09-21
Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3230 - 2005-03-31
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3230 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis J. Millard
erroneous, whether they satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5988 - 2005-03-31
erroneous, whether they satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5988 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Clyde Kreutter v. Midwest MedicalHomecare, Inc.
which we review de novo. See Park Bank-West v. Mueller, 151 Wis.2d 476, 482, 444 N.W.2d 754, 757 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8655 - 2017-09-19
which we review de novo. See Park Bank-West v. Mueller, 151 Wis.2d 476, 482, 444 N.W.2d 754, 757 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8655 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jessica L. Edwardson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
¶7 Whether a duty exists in a case is a question of law that we review de novo. See First Nat’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16086 - 2017-09-21
¶7 Whether a duty exists in a case is a question of law that we review de novo. See First Nat’l
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16086 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
court’s findings of historical fact under the deferential clearly erroneous standard, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53009 - 2014-09-15
court’s findings of historical fact under the deferential clearly erroneous standard, but review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53009 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo, but whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is a decision left
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370507 - 2021-05-25
review de novo, but whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is a decision left
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370507 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
proceeding presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Milwaukee Cnty. v. LIRC, 142 Wis. 2d 307
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646474 - 2023-04-25
proceeding presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Milwaukee Cnty. v. LIRC, 142 Wis. 2d 307
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646474 - 2023-04-25