Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12981 - 12990 of 39469 for indications.
Search results 12981 - 12990 of 39469 for indications.
CA Blank Order
docket entries indicate Stites filed his motion to vacate the repeater enhancement on August 28, 2012
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102157 - 2013-09-17
docket entries indicate Stites filed his motion to vacate the repeater enhancement on August 28, 2012
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102157 - 2013-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
indicates that the court ruled against Edmonson “for the reasons stated on the record.” Unfortunately, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137504 - 2017-09-21
indicates that the court ruled against Edmonson “for the reasons stated on the record.” Unfortunately, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137504 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lewis Altman, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
indicated, the only issue addressed by the circuit court was whether there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14136 - 2014-09-15
indicated, the only issue addressed by the circuit court was whether there was sufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14136 - 2014-09-15
State v. Darrell Aferon Morrow
Wis. 2d 417, 626 N.W.2d 811. The only evidence before the circuit court indicated that the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26254 - 2006-08-21
Wis. 2d 417, 626 N.W.2d 811. The only evidence before the circuit court indicated that the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26254 - 2006-08-21
State v. Eric J. Debrow
contrary indication in the record, we necessarily affirm. We do not go beyond the trial court’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13711 - 2005-03-31
contrary indication in the record, we necessarily affirm. We do not go beyond the trial court’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13711 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, indicating that he has conducted an investigation leading to the conclusion that further proceedings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161903 - 2017-09-21
, indicating that he has conducted an investigation leading to the conclusion that further proceedings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161903 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Davis
indicates that trial counsel did not seek a new preliminary hearing before trial. 2017-09-19T22:46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9743 - 2017-09-19
indicates that trial counsel did not seek a new preliminary hearing before trial. 2017-09-19T22:46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9743 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
indicate that the hearing on November 9, 2018, pertained to a motion for relief pending appeal filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252913 - 2020-01-24
indicate that the hearing on November 9, 2018, pertained to a motion for relief pending appeal filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252913 - 2020-01-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). This failure does not present a potentially meritorious issue for appeal, as there is no indication
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823880 - 2024-07-10
). This failure does not present a potentially meritorious issue for appeal, as there is no indication
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823880 - 2024-07-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). This failure does not present a potentially meritorious issue for appeal, as there is no indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823880 - 2024-07-10
). This failure does not present a potentially meritorious issue for appeal, as there is no indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823880 - 2024-07-10