Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 2576 for dnr.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 2576 for dnr.
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994) (An appellant “cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2498 - 2005-03-31
. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994) (An appellant “cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2498 - 2005-03-31
DC Transport of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Kenneth Hass
Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994). We therefore reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16078 - 2005-03-31
Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994). We therefore reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16078 - 2005-03-31
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
). If the language of a statute is clear, we must give effect to the plain meaning. See DNR v. Wisconsin Power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
). If the language of a statute is clear, we must give effect to the plain meaning. See DNR v. Wisconsin Power
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13316 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the validity of the trial court’s ruling. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99, 101 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
the validity of the trial court’s ruling. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99, 101 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102702 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Benedict Reischel
retroactive application is a question of law subject to our de novo review. Salzman v. DNR, 168 Wis. 2d 523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20
retroactive application is a question of law subject to our de novo review. Salzman v. DNR, 168 Wis. 2d 523
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4166 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
effect to the plain meaning. See DNR v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co., 108 Wis.2d 403, 407-08, 321 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
effect to the plain meaning. See DNR v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co., 108 Wis.2d 403, 407-08, 321 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
interpretation and application are questions of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. Andersen v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86384 - 2014-09-15
interpretation and application are questions of law that an appellate court reviews de novo. Andersen v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86384 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State Public Defender v. Circuit Court for Fond Du Lac County
, the method so prescribed is exclusive. Sewerage Comm'n v. DNR, 102 Wis.2d 613, 630, 307 N.W.2d 189, 198
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8248 - 2017-09-19
, the method so prescribed is exclusive. Sewerage Comm'n v. DNR, 102 Wis.2d 613, 630, 307 N.W.2d 189, 198
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8248 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction over the defendant even if there is no prejudice. See DNR v. Walworth County Bd. of Adjust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72951 - 2014-09-15
jurisdiction over the defendant even if there is no prejudice. See DNR v. Walworth County Bd. of Adjust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72951 - 2014-09-15
Gail Ann Ernst v. Samuel Adolph Ernst
, DNR, 50 Wis.2d 152, 161, 183 N.W.2d 77, 81 (1971). Having concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9001 - 2005-03-31
, DNR, 50 Wis.2d 152, 161, 183 N.W.2d 77, 81 (1971). Having concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9001 - 2005-03-31