Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 3817 for dollar.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 3817 for dollar.
State v. Charles V. Royster
impose the maximum penalty if the dollar amount is the maximum under the statute. Here, there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
impose the maximum penalty if the dollar amount is the maximum under the statute. Here, there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2009AP728 Cir. Ct. No. 2007CV4035
$200 million dollars from the Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund to the Medical
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44477 - 2014-09-15
$200 million dollars from the Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund to the Medical
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44477 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
through many years, probably through many thousands of dollars of evaluation and treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36574 - 2009-05-26
through many years, probably through many thousands of dollars of evaluation and treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36574 - 2009-05-26
Schams Joint Revocable Trust by David F. Schams v. William M. Evans
of the clouds Evans had placed on his title which could be quantified in dollars and cents. Nor has Schams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14841 - 2005-03-31
of the clouds Evans had placed on his title which could be quantified in dollars and cents. Nor has Schams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14841 - 2005-03-31
Susan Vanderhoof v. Peter J. Vanderhoof
a dollar amount for family support but directed the parties to run income figures through a computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15550 - 2005-03-31
a dollar amount for family support but directed the parties to run income figures through a computer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15550 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of dollars. We uphold the family court’s decision that Findley was unable to make his payment because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
of dollars. We uphold the family court’s decision that Findley was unable to make his payment because his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34980 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of $750 dollars. Because of the multiple DNA surcharges, we previously put these appeals on hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219641 - 2018-09-20
of $750 dollars. Because of the multiple DNA surcharges, we previously put these appeals on hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219641 - 2018-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, stereo, and speakers. $18,000 worth. At a time when he is seventeen thousand dollars in arrears on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63275 - 2011-05-03
, stereo, and speakers. $18,000 worth. At a time when he is seventeen thousand dollars in arrears on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63275 - 2011-05-03
Land Title Services, Inc. v. Donald W. Kemnitz, Jr.
that goes by, that dollar number, it’s never going to go down, always is going to go up. So the attitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5245 - 2005-03-31
that goes by, that dollar number, it’s never going to go down, always is going to go up. So the attitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5245 - 2005-03-31
Mary K. Fischer v. The AmPacis Company
-party beneficiary, is the dollar amount that she would have received had the life insurance been in full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9963 - 2005-03-31
-party beneficiary, is the dollar amount that she would have received had the life insurance been in full
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9963 - 2005-03-31