Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 24970 for extending.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 24970 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision. With the repeater enhancer, Ray was subject to a maximum sentence of 16 years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11
of extended supervision. With the repeater enhancer, Ray was subject to a maximum sentence of 16 years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033786 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
of extended supervision on all three counts to be served concurrently. The presentence investigation report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31766 - 2014-09-15
of extended supervision on all three counts to be served concurrently. The presentence investigation report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31766 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the canine sniff “did not measurably extend the length of the traffic stop beyond the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201649 - 2017-11-09
to the canine sniff “did not measurably extend the length of the traffic stop beyond the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201649 - 2017-11-09
COURT OF APPEALS
and a half years’ initial confinement plus two years’ extended supervision on the false imprisonment charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50757 - 2010-06-08
and a half years’ initial confinement plus two years’ extended supervision on the false imprisonment charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50757 - 2010-06-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Notably, Brown expressly did not decide whether to extend that holding to “action[s] for speeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657008 - 2023-05-16
. Notably, Brown expressly did not decide whether to extend that holding to “action[s] for speeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=657008 - 2023-05-16
Sheboygan County v. John J. V.
NETTESHEIM, J.[1] John J.V. appeals from an order extending his Wis. Stat. ch. 51 commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26576 - 2006-09-26
NETTESHEIM, J.[1] John J.V. appeals from an order extending his Wis. Stat. ch. 51 commitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26576 - 2006-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, consisting of five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366649 - 2021-05-13
, consisting of five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The prosecutor
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=366649 - 2021-05-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement followed by twenty years of extended supervision; on counts 24 and 47-49 (first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503204 - 2022-04-06
of initial confinement followed by twenty years of extended supervision; on counts 24 and 47-49 (first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=503204 - 2022-04-06
COURT OF APPEALS
that the grandmother show that she had resided with the children for an extended period. We reject the children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134439 - 2015-03-04
that the grandmother show that she had resided with the children for an extended period. We reject the children’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134439 - 2015-03-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
revocation of his extended supervision. Appellate counsel, Benjamin James Peirce, has filed a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92604 - 2014-09-15
revocation of his extended supervision. Appellate counsel, Benjamin James Peirce, has filed a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92604 - 2014-09-15