Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 9548 for jurors.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 9548 for jurors.
COURT OF APPEALS
of prospective jurors admitted to either reading the headline and/or a portion of the article. After voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29347 - 2007-06-11
of prospective jurors admitted to either reading the headline and/or a portion of the article. After voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29347 - 2007-06-11
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
, but the jury’s answers were not unanimous. On question 2, jurors Hanson and Sparks dissented; on questions 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16001 - 2017-09-21
, but the jury’s answers were not unanimous. On question 2, jurors Hanson and Sparks dissented; on questions 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16001 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of prospective jurors admitted to either reading the headline and/or a portion of the article. After voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29347 - 2014-09-15
of prospective jurors admitted to either reading the headline and/or a portion of the article. After voir dire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
, but the jury’s answers were not unanimous. On question 2, jurors Hanson and Sparks dissented; on questions 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16004 - 2017-09-21
, but the jury’s answers were not unanimous. On question 2, jurors Hanson and Sparks dissented; on questions 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Howard A.
, but the jury’s answers were not unanimous. On question 2, jurors Hanson and Sparks dissented; on questions 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16003 - 2017-09-21
, but the jury’s answers were not unanimous. On question 2, jurors Hanson and Sparks dissented; on questions 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16003 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kirk Bintzler
not have barred Bintzler from contacting jurors after the trial. Upon review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10256 - 2017-09-20
not have barred Bintzler from contacting jurors after the trial. Upon review of the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10256 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
IN RE THE MATTER OF JURY TRIALS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
of this state, especially jury trials, presents substantial health risks to the public, to jurors, to witnesses
/news/docs/jurytrials1.pdf - 2020-03-22
of this state, especially jury trials, presents substantial health risks to the public, to jurors, to witnesses
/news/docs/jurytrials1.pdf - 2020-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-05 (1986). Batson forbids the State from striking jurors based solely on race. See State v. Lamon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165485 - 2017-09-21
-05 (1986). Batson forbids the State from striking jurors based solely on race. See State v. Lamon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Sutherland
. Sutherland contends that: (1) there was hostility at trial because a juror who “was recognized as deaf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2554 - 2017-09-19
. Sutherland contends that: (1) there was hostility at trial because a juror who “was recognized as deaf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2554 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
is African-American, the striking of the only black juror was a violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34164 - 2008-09-30
is African-American, the striking of the only black juror was a violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34164 - 2008-09-30