Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 6659 for mix.

[PDF] NOTICE
the trial court’s denial of a suppression motion pursuant to a mixed standard of review. See Clappes, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41824 - 2014-09-15

CA Blank Order
appeals. Standard of review The issue of ineffective assistance of counsel presents a mixed question
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20

State v. Frederick B. Rogers
counsel’s actions constitute ineffective assistance presents a mixed question of fact and law. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4316 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
to a hearing for the relief requested is a mixed standard of review.” State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119600 - 2014-08-14

State v. Dale W. Repinski
involves a mixed question of law and fact. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d 121, 127, 449 N.W.2d 845, 848
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10179 - 2005-03-31

State v. Bernard A. Graef
of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. Id. at 6. Trial counsel's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10061 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gerald D. Taylor
sentence. ¶12 In reviewing this issue our standard is mixed; we review historical facts under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7102 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Charlene Cortes
Supreme Court concluded that Nelson set forth a two-part test that requires a mixed standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3221 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress. The review of a trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress presents a mixed question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382135 - 2021-06-29

[PDF] NOTICE
without an evidentiary hearing using a mixed standard of review. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36847 - 2014-09-15