Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 7604 for ow.

State v. Brad S. Miller
the payment of his child support obligations owed pursuant to a 1991 paternity action.[2] The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17812 - 2005-07-06

New Hampshire Insurance Company, Inc. v. Carole Timblin
judgment based upon its determination that Timblin owed New Hampshire additional premiums for a commercial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16009 - 2005-03-31

Richard L. Aeby v. Peggy A. Laska
that because Laska had not proven that any additional work was necessary, Aeby did not owe her anything
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26070 - 2006-08-01

2007 WI APP 243
subrogation claim, we address its argument that Mayer has waived her right to contest the amount she owes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30517 - 2007-11-27

[PDF] State v. Brad S. Miller
of his child support obligations owed pursuant to a 1991 paternity action.2 The court also ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17812 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 35
Republic owe Backus $25,313.11, and demands judgment against the three, jointly and severally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92651 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
Alan’s by $119,699.55. After deducting the $340,000 conversion, the court determined Mark owed the LLC
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63390 - 2011-05-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-claims action seeking $10,000 for the difference between the amount Rangel owed Creative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944763 - 2025-04-24

Opportunity Homes, Inc. v. John Malec
in compensatory damages and valued his share in MHII at $257,232. The jury further found that MHII owed OHI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5017 - 2005-03-31

Edward Baumann v. Matthew F. Elliott
contended that it did not owe SAC coverage under “Coverage B” for “Personal and Advertising Injury Liability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18849 - 2005-07-05