Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 1645 for x's.
Search results 1301 - 1310 of 1645 for x's.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
penalty for the offenses as “$100,000 or 40 years imprisonment or both x 3 = $300,000 or 120 years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=323236 - 2021-01-12
penalty for the offenses as “$100,000 or 40 years imprisonment or both x 3 = $300,000 or 120 years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=323236 - 2021-01-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
heard from expert X, witnesses Y and Z, and the subject individual, and has reviewed the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762672 - 2024-02-14
heard from expert X, witnesses Y and Z, and the subject individual, and has reviewed the following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762672 - 2024-02-14
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Keith
a doctor giving you pain medication and setting your leg without taking a medical history and an x-ray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11268 - 2017-09-19
a doctor giving you pain medication and setting your leg without taking a medical history and an x-ray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11268 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
favorable to Roberta. And that’s what I do too. If, if the testimony I’ve heard means X, Y and Z
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66071 - 2014-09-15
favorable to Roberta. And that’s what I do too. If, if the testimony I’ve heard means X, Y and Z
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66071 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
discovery materials. We reject Holifield’s argument. X. Argument that Holifield’s lawyer failed to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98665 - 2013-07-01
discovery materials. We reject Holifield’s argument. X. Argument that Holifield’s lawyer failed to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98665 - 2013-07-01
State v. Edward L. Riley
by air, and he was coughing heavily when he was initially booked. Riley was sent to the hospital for X
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31
by air, and he was coughing heavily when he was initially booked. Riley was sent to the hospital for X
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13903 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
($4,000 x 56 months = $224,000). We could not affirm on this basis because our doing so would amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85471 - 2014-09-15
($4,000 x 56 months = $224,000). We could not affirm on this basis because our doing so would amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85471 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: 1) “The court will grant the request to have X removed from the courtroom.” and 2) “I agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143485 - 2017-09-21
: 1) “The court will grant the request to have X removed from the courtroom.” and 2) “I agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143485 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. 3. For a print of an X-ray, $10 per image. 4. If the requester is not the patient or a person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=457347 - 2022-01-21
. 3. For a print of an X-ray, $10 per image. 4. If the requester is not the patient or a person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=457347 - 2022-01-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
($4,000 x 56 months = $224,000). We could not affirm on this basis because our doing so would amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85473 - 2014-09-15
($4,000 x 56 months = $224,000). We could not affirm on this basis because our doing so would amount
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85473 - 2014-09-15