Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13001 - 13010 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13001 - 13010 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Susan M. Curtis
, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 207, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We then review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71767 - 2011-10-03
, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 207, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We then review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71767 - 2011-10-03
[PDF]
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
to a “practice” hearing before a court commissioner before trying the case de novo before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14029 - 2014-09-15
to a “practice” hearing before a court commissioner before trying the case de novo before the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14029 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if they violated WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4c). Statutory interpretation raises a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111774 - 2017-09-21
, or if they violated WIS. STAT. § 23.33(4c). Statutory interpretation raises a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111774 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is denied without an evidentiary hearing, this court reviews de novo “whether the motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664730 - 2023-06-06
is denied without an evidentiary hearing, this court reviews de novo “whether the motion on its face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=664730 - 2023-06-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as to the circumstances of Shaw’s stop. We review de novo whether a given set of circumstances constitutes reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561405 - 2022-09-01
as to the circumstances of Shaw’s stop. We review de novo whether a given set of circumstances constitutes reasonable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561405 - 2022-09-01
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Irish
), STATS.3 The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19
), STATS.3 The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19
State v. Todd E. Crider
of law we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31
of law we review de novo. See State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506 (1997). ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15465 - 2005-03-31
State v. Billy J. Doudna
Whether undisputed facts violate a constitutional standard presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
Whether undisputed facts violate a constitutional standard presents a question of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6406 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06(4), is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98788 - 2013-07-01
. § 974.06(4), is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98788 - 2013-07-01