Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13011 - 13020 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13011 - 13020 of 30115 for de.
[PDF]
WI APP 123
correctly interpreted a state statute is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶54. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87966 - 2014-09-15
correctly interpreted a state statute is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Id., ¶54. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87966 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joseph H. Savage
omitted). When reviewing a bindover determination, we will examine the record de novo to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19274 - 2017-09-21
omitted). When reviewing a bindover determination, we will examine the record de novo to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Terry Locke v. Town of Menasha
). The meaning of an ordinance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10733 - 2017-09-20
). The meaning of an ordinance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10733 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Steven Spring
undisputed facts show probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we review de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10738 - 2017-09-20
undisputed facts show probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we review de novo, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10738 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9932 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9932 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire
. This appeal and cross-appeal followed. ANALYSIS ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2984 - 2017-09-19
. This appeal and cross-appeal followed. ANALYSIS ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2984 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Sydney J. Harris v. Chauncy Steed Harris
of law, which we review de novo.” Id. at 391. However, when a question of law is intertwined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19
of law, which we review de novo.” Id. at 391. However, when a question of law is intertwined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2606 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Buena Park Improvement Association v. Richard H. Sohr
appeal. ¶5 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19324 - 2017-09-21
appeal. ¶5 Our review of the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo, and we use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19324 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Quincy J. White
that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2644 - 2017-09-19
that we decide de novo. State v. Krier, 165 Wis. 2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2644 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Susan M. Curtis
, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19
, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102 (Ct. App. 1994). However, despite our de novo standard of review, we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2939 - 2017-09-19