Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13011 - 13020 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 13011 - 13020 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
Leonard Collins v. Marianne A. Cooke
may extend the period by as many days as the prisoner proves have elapsed between the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15491 - 2017-09-21
may extend the period by as many days as the prisoner proves have elapsed between the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to thirteen years—eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. Reyna filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175188 - 2017-09-21
to thirteen years—eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. Reyna filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175188 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
months’ extended supervision, imposed and stayed in favor of four years’ probation. Horton’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76949 - 2014-09-15
months’ extended supervision, imposed and stayed in favor of four years’ probation. Horton’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76949 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convictions and that a sentence of two years’, six months’ initial confinement and three years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143847 - 2017-09-21
convictions and that a sentence of two years’, six months’ initial confinement and three years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143847 - 2017-09-21
John R. Ammerman v. Adams County Board of Adjustment
requiring it to extend the same privilege to others. On certiorari review, the circuit court reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13123 - 2005-03-31
requiring it to extend the same privilege to others. On certiorari review, the circuit court reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13123 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
’ extended supervision.[1] Troupe moved for resentencing, asserting the circuit court had failed to properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127140 - 2014-11-11
’ extended supervision.[1] Troupe moved for resentencing, asserting the circuit court had failed to properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127140 - 2014-11-11
CA Blank Order
to nine years’ initial confinement plus eight years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101587 - 2013-09-03
to nine years’ initial confinement plus eight years’ extended supervision. This no-merit appeal followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101587 - 2013-09-03
COURT OF APPEALS
a dispositive motion should be extended. At the summary judgment motion hearing on October 23, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135721 - 2015-02-25
a dispositive motion should be extended. At the summary judgment motion hearing on October 23, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135721 - 2015-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
extended beyond its original fifteen-month term. The court therefore reasonably concluded Phone Line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51186 - 2010-06-21
extended beyond its original fifteen-month term. The court therefore reasonably concluded Phone Line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51186 - 2010-06-21
Edwin Swedlund v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission
for extended periods without discomfort. Further uncontroverted evidence establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9450 - 2005-03-31
for extended periods without discomfort. Further uncontroverted evidence establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9450 - 2005-03-31