Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13011 - 13020 of 81718 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 13011 - 13020 of 81718 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
State v. Ernest J. P., Jr.
, v. Ernest J. P., Jr., Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21324 - 2006-02-07
, v. Ernest J. P., Jr., Respondent-Appellant. APPEAL from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21324 - 2006-02-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testing of his blood should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380917 - 2021-06-24
testing of his blood should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380917 - 2021-06-24
Alexandra Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc.
Communications, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3242 - 2005-03-31
Communications, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3242 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alexandra Mucek v. Nationwide Communications, Inc.
. NATIONWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3242 - 2017-09-19
. NATIONWIDE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3242 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decision in case no. 2013AP2316-CR
? Was the circuit court’s order overly broad in holding that Act 21’s provisions could never be lawfully applied
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170047 - 2017-09-21
? Was the circuit court’s order overly broad in holding that Act 21’s provisions could never be lawfully applied
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170047 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BRITNEY M. LANGLOIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79065 - 2014-09-15
. BRITNEY M. LANGLOIS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79065 - 2014-09-15
State v. Samuel Arthur Brown
from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: timothy g. dugan, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16039 - 2005-03-31
from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: timothy g. dugan, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16039 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Arthur Brown
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TIMOTHY G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16039 - 2017-09-21
, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: TIMOTHY G
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16039 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. HOLIFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27498 - 2014-09-15
. HOLIFIELD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27498 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Jeffrey A. Conen, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Jeffrey A. Conen, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27498 - 2006-12-18