Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13021 - 13030 of 24584 for extending.
Search results 13021 - 13030 of 24584 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
extended to new factor claims but argues that the claim is not a new factor claim. It argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652078 - 2023-05-04
extended to new factor claims but argues that the claim is not a new factor claim. It argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=652078 - 2023-05-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
convictions and that a sentence of two years’, six months’ initial confinement and three years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143847 - 2017-09-21
convictions and that a sentence of two years’, six months’ initial confinement and three years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143847 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision.[3] In 2009, Rouse, pro se, filed a motion to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision.[3] In 2009, Rouse, pro se, filed a motion to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and five years of extended supervision. The court denied Staten’s postconviction motion without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237764 - 2019-03-18
confinement and five years of extended supervision. The court denied Staten’s postconviction motion without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237764 - 2019-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Manuel Sergio Martinez
him to thirteen years of initial confinement and twelve years of extended supervision. ¶3 Martinez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21
him to thirteen years of initial confinement and twelve years of extended supervision. ¶3 Martinez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18201 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and thirty-five years of extended supervision. This appeal follows. On appeal, Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451305 - 2021-11-10
confinement and thirty-five years of extended supervision. This appeal follows. On appeal, Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=451305 - 2021-11-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of initial confinement, followed by seven years of extended supervision). ¶3 In December of 2011, Smart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96325 - 2014-09-15
of initial confinement, followed by seven years of extended supervision). ¶3 In December of 2011, Smart
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96325 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with eighteen months, extended supervision and a consecutive six months in jail on the other. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
with eighteen months, extended supervision and a consecutive six months in jail on the other. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108402 - 2014-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
followed by four years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192113 - 2017-09-21
followed by four years of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192113 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
to fully and tenaciously represent his or her client does not extend to the presentation of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9121 - 2017-09-19
to fully and tenaciously represent his or her client does not extend to the presentation of evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9121 - 2017-09-19