Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13031 - 13040 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13031 - 13040 of 30115 for de.
Andrea Arenas v. Chad Matthews
. This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11080 - 2005-03-31
. This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. See Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11080 - 2005-03-31
Mary Ann Strnad v. Edward Strnad
that it was subject to division under Wis. Stat. § 767.255. We reject Edward’s “de minimus” argument.[4] Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4220 - 2005-03-31
that it was subject to division under Wis. Stat. § 767.255. We reject Edward’s “de minimus” argument.[4] Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4220 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph E. Heifort
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 Heifort argues that his counsel should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6878 - 2005-03-31
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶9 Heifort argues that his counsel should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6878 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph P. Hogan
probable cause under this standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17631 - 2005-04-13
probable cause under this standard is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Babbitt, 188 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17631 - 2005-04-13
[PDF]
State v. Christopher J. Klingeisen
denied this due process right is a constitutional issue presenting a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4906 - 2017-09-19
denied this due process right is a constitutional issue presenting a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4906 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law reviewed de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. If a defendant’s postconviction motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21
of law reviewed de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310. If a defendant’s postconviction motion does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186774 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Town of Dunn v. Michael L. Woodman
constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15244 - 2017-09-21
constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Babbitt, 188
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an error is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363245 - 2021-05-05
an error is harmless is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Magett, 2014 WI 67, ¶29, 355
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363245 - 2021-05-05
[PDF]
Taxman Investment Company v. Andrew J. Shaw
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13591 - 2017-09-21
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-16, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13591 - 2017-09-21
State v. Andres Godina
a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31
a defendant has met his or her burden of proof is also a question of law which is reviewed de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13093 - 2005-03-31