Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13031 - 13040 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 13031 - 13040 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
moved for summary judgment on all four claims. The motion was granted by written decision on August 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33506 - 2008-07-29
moved for summary judgment on all four claims. The motion was granted by written decision on August 16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33506 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
Brent J. Stubbe v. Guidant Mutual Insurance Company
policy with a $50,000 liability limit, and Stubbe settled his claim against Thielmann and Thielmann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4391 - 2017-09-19
policy with a $50,000 liability limit, and Stubbe settled his claim against Thielmann and Thielmann’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4391 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the car driver’s coverage limits. Consequently, Choles filed an underinsured motorist claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48078 - 2014-09-15
the car driver’s coverage limits. Consequently, Choles filed an underinsured motorist claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48078 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Michele A. Dussault v. Chrysler Corporation
two independent violations of the Lemon Law. The first claim sought “the choice of either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13748 - 2014-09-15
two independent violations of the Lemon Law. The first claim sought “the choice of either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13748 - 2014-09-15
James Gumz v. Northern States Power Company
The Gumzes cross-appeal summary judgment in Northern’s favor, dismissing their treble damages claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25915 - 2006-08-29
The Gumzes cross-appeal summary judgment in Northern’s favor, dismissing their treble damages claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25915 - 2006-08-29
Michele A. Dussault v. Chrysler Corporation
Law. The first claim sought “the choice of either a comparable new motor vehicle or rescission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13748 - 2005-03-31
Law. The first claim sought “the choice of either a comparable new motor vehicle or rescission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13748 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion in which he asserted a speedy trial violation and claimed ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847793 - 2024-09-10
motion in which he asserted a speedy trial violation and claimed ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=847793 - 2024-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
pro se motion for postconviction relief.[2] Seymour claims that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90378 - 2012-12-10
pro se motion for postconviction relief.[2] Seymour claims that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90378 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
James Gumz v. Northern States Power Company
summary judgment in Northern’s favor, dismissing their treble damages claim. They assert the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25915 - 2017-09-21
summary judgment in Northern’s favor, dismissing their treble damages claim. They assert the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25915 - 2017-09-21
Friends of Kenwood v. Michael Green
Kenwood claims that the trial court erred when it granted the motion to dismiss for failure to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2375 - 2005-03-31
Kenwood claims that the trial court erred when it granted the motion to dismiss for failure to state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2375 - 2005-03-31

