Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13041 - 13050 of 83673 for case search.
Search results 13041 - 13050 of 83673 for case search.
State v. Jeffrey D. Benson
This case began when two police officers attempted to stop Jeffrey D. Benson’s car for speeding. Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5645 - 2005-03-31
This case began when two police officers attempted to stop Jeffrey D. Benson’s car for speeding. Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5645 - 2005-03-31
Teddy A. Schlueter v. Kae Hubred
affirm. FACTS ¶2 The parties dispute material facts of this case. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6409 - 2005-03-31
affirm. FACTS ¶2 The parties dispute material facts of this case. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6409 - 2005-03-31
Thomas M. Teubel v. Prime Development, Inc.
2002 WI App 26 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1098 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3879 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 26 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 01-1098 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3879 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to suppress evidence. There are two issues in this case: (1) whether the stop of Lamb’s vehicle constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43703 - 2014-09-15
to suppress evidence. There are two issues in this case: (1) whether the stop of Lamb’s vehicle constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43703 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
expressly noted that the so-called “add-back” line of cases comes under the “contribution to the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79891 - 2012-03-27
expressly noted that the so-called “add-back” line of cases comes under the “contribution to the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79891 - 2012-03-27
[PDF]
Teddy A. Schlueter v. Kae Hubred
affirm. FACTS ¶2 The parties dispute material facts of this case. However, uncontroverted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6409 - 2017-09-19
affirm. FACTS ¶2 The parties dispute material facts of this case. However, uncontroverted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6409 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
were multiplicitous. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On August 17, 2018, police were executing a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527096 - 2022-06-01
were multiplicitous. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On August 17, 2018, police were executing a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527096 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
of defending his case.” See id., ¶70 (citation omitted). ¶6 Nelson has not shown that the “Peter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33325 - 2014-09-15
of defending his case.” See id., ¶70 (citation omitted). ¶6 Nelson has not shown that the “Peter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33325 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Eric D.B. v. Denise L.B.
. This case comes before us following a remand for a custody determination. On remand, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2390 - 2017-09-19
. This case comes before us following a remand for a custody determination. On remand, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2390 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for dismissal of the other charge and dismissal of a separate pending criminal case. The State also agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195024 - 2017-09-21
for dismissal of the other charge and dismissal of a separate pending criminal case. The State also agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195024 - 2017-09-21