Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13041 - 13050 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13041 - 13050 of 30115 for de.
[PDF]
Oskar B. McMillian v. Terry L. Landwehr
of these extensions were granted by the circuit court, while others occurred de facto as a result of McMillian’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13449 - 2017-09-21
of these extensions were granted by the circuit court, while others occurred de facto as a result of McMillian’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13449 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gordon Ahlgren v. Pierce County
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9449 - 2017-09-19
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9449 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Village of Menomonee Falls v. Paul G. Meyer
of statutory construction which we review de novo. See State v. C.A.J., 148 Wis.2d 137, 139, 434 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14758 - 2017-09-21
of statutory construction which we review de novo. See State v. C.A.J., 148 Wis.2d 137, 139, 434 N.W.2d 800
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14758 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert E. Irish
] The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis.2d 754, 760-61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31
] The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis.2d 754, 760-61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny M. Lacy
has been violated is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
has been violated is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DISCUSSION ¶9 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209309 - 2018-03-08
DISCUSSION ¶9 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209309 - 2018-03-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, ¶11. Based on our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30399 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law, which we review de novo. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, ¶11. Based on our independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30399 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Mark Grebner v. Sharon Schiebel
. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2680 - 2017-09-19
. § 19.35(1)(b). Statutory interpretation is a question of law and is subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2680 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9931 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo. See id. A defendant seeking resentencing because of allegedly inaccurate information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21
review de novo. See id. A defendant seeking resentencing because of allegedly inaccurate information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193751 - 2017-09-21