Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13041 - 13050 of 72752 for we.
Search results 13041 - 13050 of 72752 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation rather than arguing for a lesser sentence. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lowe was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95179 - 2014-09-15
recommendation rather than arguing for a lesser sentence. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lowe was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95179 - 2014-09-15
Gary Schonscheck v. Paccar, Inc.
that substantially impaired its use or value. We disagree with Kenworth’s arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5289 - 2005-03-31
that substantially impaired its use or value. We disagree with Kenworth’s arguments and affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5289 - 2005-03-31
State v. La Rae J. Schell
the court was without the authority to preclude Schell’s placement on home monitoring, we reverse that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2005-03-31
the court was without the authority to preclude Schell’s placement on home monitoring, we reverse that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5287 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
assault of a child as a repeat offender, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49473 - 2010-04-28
assault of a child as a repeat offender, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49473 - 2010-04-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
any damages from their representation of him. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204745 - 2017-12-07
any damages from their representation of him. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204745 - 2017-12-07
State v. Norman O. Brown
] For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
] For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the trial court on the suppression issues and most of the plea issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County Health and Human Services v. Bridget D.
. We agree that the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6309 - 2017-09-19
. We agree that the trial court failed to comply with the mandatory requirement of the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6309 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit and supplemental no-merit reports, Lungren’s response, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139735 - 2015-04-14
of the no-merit and supplemental no-merit reports, Lungren’s response, and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139735 - 2015-04-14
Odis Purifoy v. Ron Malone
Although we agree that certiorari is the appropriate procedural device, we conclude that Purifoy’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4244 - 2005-03-31
Although we agree that certiorari is the appropriate procedural device, we conclude that Purifoy’s petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4244 - 2005-03-31
County of Walworth v. Dillis V. Allen
arguments. For reasons discussed in the opinion, we affirm the trial court. ¶2 The relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6199 - 2005-03-31
arguments. For reasons discussed in the opinion, we affirm the trial court. ¶2 The relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6199 - 2005-03-31