Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13051 - 13060 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13051 - 13060 of 30115 for de.
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15523 - 2005-03-31
State v. Benjamin L. Stewart
of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 230‑31, 233, 501 N.W.2d at 232-33. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8917 - 2005-03-31
of consent is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 230‑31, 233, 501 N.W.2d at 232-33. Further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8917 - 2005-03-31
Sandra Persinger v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies
is question of law, subject to appellate de novo review). Part E of the policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8916 - 2005-03-31
is question of law, subject to appellate de novo review). Part E of the policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8916 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald L. Dantuma
preclusion rule—identity of issues and parties and actual litigation of the issue—our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15492 - 2005-03-31
preclusion rule—identity of issues and parties and actual litigation of the issue—our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15492 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Prusinski
to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11175 - 2005-03-31
to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11175 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Steven P. Fleming
determination NO. 96-3022 4 de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11593 - 2017-09-19
determination NO. 96-3022 4 de novo. State v. Babbitt, 188 Wis.2d 349, 356, 525 N.W.2d 102, 104
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11593 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Craig T. Bates
the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11523 - 2017-09-19
the defendant is a question of law which we review de novo without deference to the trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11523 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. The circuit court did not directly address this question.[2] However, our review is de novo and we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27250 - 2006-11-28
. The circuit court did not directly address this question.[2] However, our review is de novo and we may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27250 - 2006-11-28
[PDF]
The Shelby Insurance Company v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15181 - 2017-09-21
of an insurance policy is a question of law which we decide de novo. See Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15181 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of their anticipated search of the residence Flahavan shared with Lehr. However, my review is de novo, see Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182979 - 2017-09-21
of their anticipated search of the residence Flahavan shared with Lehr. However, my review is de novo, see Young
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182979 - 2017-09-21