Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13061 - 13070 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13061 - 13070 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Craig J. Anderson
, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. To prove deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12555 - 2017-09-21
, which this court decides de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. To prove deficient performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12555 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
factor presents a question of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126712 - 2017-09-21
factor presents a question of law we review de novo, whether and to what degree a sentence should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126712 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo whether the court applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166262 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and we review de novo whether the court applied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark G. Willard
a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d 774 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18920 - 2017-09-21
a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Penzkofer, 184 Wis. 2d 262, 264, 516 N.W.2d 774 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18920 - 2017-09-21
William Olson v. Sidney Kaprelian
agreement) meet the statutory requirements is a question of law which we review de novo. See Kania v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9560 - 2005-03-31
agreement) meet the statutory requirements is a question of law which we review de novo. See Kania v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9560 - 2005-03-31
Robert P. Murphy v. MCC, Inc.
is a question of law we review de novo. Gunka v. Consolidated Papers, Inc., 179 Wis. 2d 525, 531, 508 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4913 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law we review de novo. Gunka v. Consolidated Papers, Inc., 179 Wis. 2d 525, 531, 508 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4913 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Weber
. This case rests upon statutory construction, which is a question of law, and this court applies a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14517 - 2005-03-31
. This case rests upon statutory construction, which is a question of law, and this court applies a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14517 - 2005-03-31
State v. Duane E. Bolstad
fact, which we review de novo. State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis. 2d 59, 66, 525 N.W.2d 294 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2661 - 2005-03-31
fact, which we review de novo. State v. Greenwold, 189 Wis. 2d 59, 66, 525 N.W.2d 294 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2661 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard Bendlin
of the trial court’s determination that Bendlin was “in custody” is de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13630 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s determination that Bendlin was “in custody” is de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13630 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joachim E. Dressler
is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶24. ¶6 Dressler makes several arguments which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07
is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶24. ¶6 Dressler makes several arguments which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07