Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13061 - 13070 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13061 - 13070 of 30115 for de.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviews de novo. See Walworth County v. Therese B., 2003 WI App 223, ¶21, 267 Wis. 2d 310, 671 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707827 - 2023-09-26
reviews de novo. See Walworth County v. Therese B., 2003 WI App 223, ¶21, 267 Wis. 2d 310, 671 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707827 - 2023-09-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Portage County Courthouse Electronic Notice Mark S. Des Rochers Electronic Notice Raven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710225 - 2023-10-05
Portage County Courthouse Electronic Notice Mark S. Des Rochers Electronic Notice Raven
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=710225 - 2023-10-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213111 - 2018-05-22
then “review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” See State v. Eason, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213111 - 2018-05-22
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Allen T. Ritchey
violated Ritchey’s rights is a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20224 - 2017-09-21
violated Ritchey’s rights is a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20224 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Wilder
), STATS.; State v. Harris, 206 Wis.2d 242, 249, 557 N.W.2d 245, 248 (1996). We review de novo a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10563 - 2017-09-20
), STATS.; State v. Harris, 206 Wis.2d 242, 249, 557 N.W.2d 245, 248 (1996). We review de novo a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10563 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Gregory A. Gibbs
by the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11153 - 2017-09-19
by the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions is a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11153 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard the circuit court employs. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84063 - 2014-09-15
decisions de novo, applying the same methodology and legal standard the circuit court employs. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84063 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
that we review de novo. See Darlene R., 201 Wis. 2d at 639. ¶8 We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2189 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo. See Darlene R., 201 Wis. 2d at 639. ¶8 We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
that we review de novo. See Darlene R., 201 Wis. 2d at 639. ¶8 We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2190 - 2017-09-19
that we review de novo. See Darlene R., 201 Wis. 2d at 639. ¶8 We conclude that the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2190 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Keith E. Pischke v. Ken J. Sondalle
¶4 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, and its denial of reconsideration, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2115 - 2017-09-19
¶4 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment, and its denial of reconsideration, de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2115 - 2017-09-19