Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13071 - 13080 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13071 - 13080 of 30007 for consulta de causas.
State v. Oscar A. Rash
; whether a restitution order comports with the statute, however, is subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5093 - 2005-03-31
; whether a restitution order comports with the statute, however, is subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5093 - 2005-03-31
Town of Mount Pleasant v. Gerald A. Hoornstra
facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Miller Nat’l Ins. Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15195 - 2005-03-31
facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See Miller Nat’l Ins. Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 184
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15195 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424, 576 N.W.2d 912
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33828 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law that this court decides de novo. State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 424, 576 N.W.2d 912
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33828 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lazaro M.
de novo. Schmidt v. Wisconsin Employe Trust Funds Bd., 153 Wis. 2d 35, 41, 449 N.W.2d 268 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4945 - 2017-09-19
de novo. Schmidt v. Wisconsin Employe Trust Funds Bd., 153 Wis. 2d 35, 41, 449 N.W.2d 268 (1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4945 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of “whether the facts as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147170 - 2017-09-21
of “whether the facts as found by the [circuit] court meet the constitutional standard” is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147170 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michelle L. Danielson
Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. We review conclusions of law de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24947 - 2017-09-21
Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d 662, 636 N.W.2d 718. We review conclusions of law de novo. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
statute was proper is based on a de novo review. State v. Anderson, 141 Wis.2d 653, 658, 416 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11605 - 2017-09-19
statute was proper is based on a de novo review. State v. Anderson, 141 Wis.2d 653, 658, 416 N.W.2d 276
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
675, 729 N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
675, 729 N.W.2d 182. We review de novo whether the facts satisfy the constitutional standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
City of Clintonville v. Michael J. Kuhn
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2005-03-31
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis J. Millard
erroneous, whether they satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5988 - 2005-03-31
erroneous, whether they satisfy constitutional standards is a question of law we review de novo. Id. at 137
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5988 - 2005-03-31