Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13091 - 13100 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13091 - 13100 of 30056 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
State v. Shawn E. Avery
, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4227 - 2017-09-19
, the application of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we decide de novo without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4227 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert E. Irish
), STATS.3 The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19
), STATS.3 The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11250 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review de novo, but whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is a decision left
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370507 - 2021-05-25
review de novo, but whether that new factor justifies sentence modification is a decision left
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=370507 - 2021-05-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court, and benefiting from the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184864 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court, and benefiting from the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184864 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1999). Here, the facts are undisputed and thus we review de novo. ¶9 Wetzel argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91012 - 2014-09-15
(1999). Here, the facts are undisputed and thus we review de novo. ¶9 Wetzel argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91012 - 2014-09-15
State v. Donald C. Lee
is presented which we consider de novo. Id. at 682, 508 N.W.2d at 52‑53. We must first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8602 - 2005-03-31
is presented which we consider de novo. Id. at 682, 508 N.W.2d at 52‑53. We must first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8602 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael H.
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2348 - 2017-09-19
presents a question of law subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2348 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
George D. French, Jr. v. Ronald R. Fiedler
of Vivid. Our review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10809 - 2017-09-20
of Vivid. Our review of summary judgments is de novo; we apply the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10809 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Brown County v. Grey C.B.
to a particular set of facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14248 - 2014-09-15
to a particular set of facts is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Minuteman, Inc. v. Alexander, 147
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14248 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous. We then review de novo the application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26