Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13091 - 13100 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 13091 - 13100 of 24568 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
, consisting of four years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision on two of the convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34815 - 2008-12-08
, consisting of four years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision on two of the convictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34815 - 2008-12-08
State v. William D. Shaw
indicated that during this extended period of visitation he and his children were going to go camping. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11301 - 2005-03-31
indicated that during this extended period of visitation he and his children were going to go camping. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a child. The court imposed a sentence of ten years of initial confinement and ten years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107037 - 2017-09-21
of a child. The court imposed a sentence of ten years of initial confinement and ten years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107037 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia Glasheen v. Joseph J. Glasheen
for an extended period of time and Patricia’s subsequent cohabitation with a “significant other” are all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11579 - 2017-09-19
for an extended period of time and Patricia’s subsequent cohabitation with a “significant other” are all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11579 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
extended for good cause and without objection. See § 48.315(1)(b), (2), (3). No issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101009 - 2013-08-20
extended for good cause and without objection. See § 48.315(1)(b), (2), (3). No issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101009 - 2013-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to consecutive sentences totaling ten years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02
to consecutive sentences totaling ten years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262710 - 2020-06-02
CA Blank Order
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision.[3] In 2009, Rouse, pro se, filed a motion to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision.[3] In 2009, Rouse, pro se, filed a motion to vacate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205696 - 2017-12-12
of initial confinement and seven years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205696 - 2017-12-12
CA Blank Order
of confinement and extended supervision. Sentence credit was granted in response to Marshall’s motion seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141480 - 2015-05-12
of confinement and extended supervision. Sentence credit was granted in response to Marshall’s motion seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141480 - 2015-05-12
COURT OF APPEALS
confinement and a thirteen-year, three-month aggregate period of extended supervision. Limehouse explicitly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
confinement and a thirteen-year, three-month aggregate period of extended supervision. Limehouse explicitly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14