Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13091 - 13100 of 58501 for o j.
Search results 13091 - 13100 of 58501 for o j.
State v. Joseph R. Luebeck
]o long as a reasonable person would feel free to disregard the police and go about his [or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24829 - 2006-05-30
]o long as a reasonable person would feel free to disregard the police and go about his [or her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24829 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, stating: “[o]nce again, we conclude that Scruggs lacks standing.” Id., ¶9. Citing Scruggs I, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165252 - 2017-09-21
, stating: “[o]nce again, we conclude that Scruggs lacks standing.” Id., ¶9. Citing Scruggs I, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165252 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
on an approved driveway under Town of Primrose Driveway Ordinance § 1.05(9), which provides that “[n]o Building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47160 - 2010-02-17
on an approved driveway under Town of Primrose Driveway Ordinance § 1.05(9), which provides that “[n]o Building
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47160 - 2010-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 The Honorable Richard O. Wright presided at the 2005 plea hearing. The Honorable Bernard N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
1 The Honorable Richard O. Wright presided at the 2005 plea hearing. The Honorable Bernard N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190531 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Sandles
by a preponderance of the credible evidence.” Id. “[T]o prove that a search or seizure within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
by a preponderance of the credible evidence.” Id. “[T]o prove that a search or seizure within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5719 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. See State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶21, 310 Wis. 2d 138, 754 N.W.2d 77. However, “[t]o qualify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825013 - 2024-07-11
. See State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶21, 310 Wis. 2d 138, 754 N.W.2d 77. However, “[t]o qualify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825013 - 2024-07-11
State v. John Henry Balsewicz
decision. Id. at ¶44 (citations and footnotes omitted). ¶15 “In Wisconsin, ‘[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5253 - 2005-03-31
decision. Id. at ¶44 (citations and footnotes omitted). ¶15 “In Wisconsin, ‘[n]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5253 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
level of [s]ex [o]ffender [t]reatment that can only be offered in an institution setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248918 - 2019-10-22
level of [s]ex [o]ffender [t]reatment that can only be offered in an institution setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248918 - 2019-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the issue in this case. Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 219, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999) (“[O]nce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268252 - 2020-07-09
the issue in this case. Paige K.B. v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 219, 594 N.W.2d 370 (1999) (“[O]nce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268252 - 2020-07-09
[PDF]
Elloy Rodriguez v. Temika King
pending. However, the order also provided that “[n]o further hearings are scheduled at this time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20170 - 2017-09-21
pending. However, the order also provided that “[n]o further hearings are scheduled at this time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20170 - 2017-09-21