Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 8206 for SC 500.

Wisconsin Court System - eFile/eCourts
about mandatory eFiling. March 2017 Civil (CV) Family (FA) Paternity (PA) Small Claims (SC) Criminal
/ecourts/efilecircuit/timeline.htm - 2026-02-20

Gil Jensen v. Mary Beschta-Bachman
. Appeal No. 02-0206-FT Cir. Ct. No. 01-SC-514 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4865 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS
Granted* 13 17 7 18 55 Civil* 8 9 2 4 23 Criminal* 5 8 5 14 32 SC Opinions on Petitions 10 12 11
/ca/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289144 - 2020-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS - CASE LOAD STATISTICS District ...
20 13 8 22 63 Civil 9 8 5 13 35 Criminal 11 5 3 9 28 SC Opinions
/ca/statsan/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108645 - 2014-02-27

[PDF] Wisconsin Worker's Compensation Uninsured Employees Fund v. Urban Artifacts, Inc.
), because it paid at least $500 in wages to any employee or employees in a calendar quarter preceding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15981 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brief of Amicus Curiae (Lisa Hunter et al.)
the probability to increase the political 2 Available at https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/scord
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefamicuscuriaehunter.pdf - 2021-10-18

[PDF] Citation to Unpublished Opinions Committee Interim Report
://wicourts.gov/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35116 2 FINAL REPORT This final report
/publications/reports/docs/unpublishedopinionsfinal.pdf - 2012-04-25

[PDF] P
is e K up sc h v. L yn n W ay ne K up sc h 09 -2 2- 20 09 A ff ir m ed 20 09
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43444 - 2014-09-15

wi app 131 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP183 Complete Title of...
and applying the Rules.” 2007 WI 4, http://www.wicourts.gov/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88252 - 2012-11-28

State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
, in particular the claim of $26,000 for work done by “SCS of Wisconsin.” Also, as Ziegler rightly points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09