Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 82690 for case code.

McCullough Plumbing, Inc. v. Village of McFarland
the Village to accept all piping allowed under Wisconsin’s uniform plumbing code, Wis. Stat. § 145.02(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20387 - 2005-11-22

[PDF] McCullough Plumbing, Inc. v. Village of McFarland
the Village to accept all piping allowed under Wisconsin’s uniform plumbing code, WIS. STAT. § 145.02(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20387 - 2017-09-21

Joel James Johnson v. James R. Blackburn
at issue in this case is § 101.645(3), which is part of the “one- and 2-family dwelling code.” It provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12483 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Joel James Johnson v. James R. Blackburn
in this case is § 101.645(3), which is part of the “one- and 2-family dwelling code.” It provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12483 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
charging him with group resistance and petitions, in violation of WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.20 (Dec
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62851 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
. Admin. Code § DOC 303.20 (Dec. 2006).[1] The charges arose out of Whiteside’s alleged involvement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62851 - 2011-04-13

[PDF] Thomas G. Nejedlo v. School District of Wausaukee
, repairing and maintaining its school building, contrary to state statutes and administrative code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18378 - 2017-09-21

Thomas G. Nejedlo v. School District of Wausaukee
, repairing and maintaining its school building, contrary to state statutes and administrative code provisions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18378 - 2005-05-31

[PDF] WI 71
monitoring is not at issue in this case, as Wis. Admin. Code § NR 243.15(3)(c)2.a. fully supports
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386188 - 2021-09-14

[PDF] Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah(Khan) v. Daniel Bertrand
a positive test is a violation of WIS. ADM. CODE § DOC 303.59(2), Kahn was given a conduct report notifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11890 - 2017-09-21