Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 68485 for did.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 68485 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
did not remember or understand the releases she previously signed did not provide a valid reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89091 - 2012-11-07
did not remember or understand the releases she previously signed did not provide a valid reason
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89091 - 2012-11-07
COURT OF APPEALS
. Tilley testified that during that time, he did not observe anyone exit the vehicle or any activity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
. Tilley testified that during that time, he did not observe anyone exit the vehicle or any activity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108029 - 2014-02-12
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Capps
incarceration. Capps filed a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12302 - 2017-09-21
incarceration. Capps filed a postconviction motion to withdraw his pleas in which he contended that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12302 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
accepting Krivoshein’s no contest pleas. The Court: First of all, did anyone make any threat or use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34096 - 2014-09-15
accepting Krivoshein’s no contest pleas. The Court: First of all, did anyone make any threat or use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34096 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
in denying his motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Ragsdale’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6980 - 2017-09-20
in denying his motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Ragsdale’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6980 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
and the circuit court did not err in denying his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93018 - 2013-04-22
and the circuit court did not err in denying his postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. Therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93018 - 2013-04-22
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
in denying his motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Ragsdale’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
in denying his motion to suppress. Because the trial court did not err in denying Ragsdale’s suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
Carol Marie Bannigan v. Jeffrey Harold Johnson
that the circuit court did not err when it implicitly determined that Bannigan had unreasonably reduced her income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15613 - 2005-03-31
that the circuit court did not err when it implicitly determined that Bannigan had unreasonably reduced her income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15613 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
improperly based its maintenance decision in part on a finding that Ken did not sacrifice his earning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108244 - 2017-09-21
improperly based its maintenance decision in part on a finding that Ken did not sacrifice his earning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108244 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
maintenance decision in part on a finding that Ken did not sacrifice his earning capacity for the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108244 - 2014-02-19
maintenance decision in part on a finding that Ken did not sacrifice his earning capacity for the marriage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108244 - 2014-02-19