Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 2538 for love.

[PDF] NOTICE
and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.” State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶43, 284 Wis. 2d 111, 700
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32389 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
assistance of trial counsel. See State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶30, 284 Wis. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134578 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
him when he had a loving relationship with the child. In his closing argument, Burridge also asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57625 - 2010-12-13

COURT OF APPEALS
and instead accepted the evidence that K.S. loved school, perhaps because it was her only zone of safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133526 - 2015-01-27

State v. James D. Lammers
). Cf. State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶¶52-54, 284 Wis. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 884 (recognizing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24598 - 2006-03-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
argues that his counsel unreasonably failed to present the mitigating factors of Sadler’s lifelong love
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239893 - 2019-04-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
would love to live with his mom if she could care for him, but he was also very happy in his foster
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195688 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
cumulative.” State v. Love, 2005 WI 116, ¶43, 284 Wis. 2d 111, 700 N.W.2d 62. For the purposes of appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32389 - 2008-04-07

CA Blank Order
their father and show love for him when they visit with him. However, the court cannot say that this behavior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138016 - 2015-03-17

CA Blank Order
be hard on L.K.F. because there was “no question she loves her children,” but the circuit court explained
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145380 - 2015-07-27