Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 64381 for records.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 64381 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39785 - 2009-08-19
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39785 - 2009-08-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39785 - 2014-09-15
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39785 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of counsel.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707800 - 2023-09-27
of counsel.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707800 - 2023-09-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The record before this court on appeal is incomplete. Among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184646 - 2017-09-21
below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The record before this court on appeal is incomplete. Among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184646 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the circuit court erred in allowing use of a transcript of a recording that he claims was illegally made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566471 - 2022-09-23
that the circuit court erred in allowing use of a transcript of a recording that he claims was illegally made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566471 - 2022-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
-five years from recording and automatically extended for ten-year periods thereafter “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53348 - 2010-08-17
-five years from recording and automatically extended for ten-year periods thereafter “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53348 - 2010-08-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Hospital medical records. The officer testified she did not receive a paper copy of the victim’s medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
Hospital medical records. The officer testified she did not receive a paper copy of the victim’s medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 8
. ¶3 On August 6, 2018, the trial court conducted the arraignment hearing.1 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618552 - 2023-03-08
. ¶3 On August 6, 2018, the trial court conducted the arraignment hearing.1 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618552 - 2023-03-08
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 14-04 Second Amended Rule Proposal (with cover sheet)
a reference to how a clerk should certify a record that has been redacted. In SCR 71.04(13) (last page
/supreme/docs/1404petitionamend2.pdf - 2015-06-22
a reference to how a clerk should certify a record that has been redacted. In SCR 71.04(13) (last page
/supreme/docs/1404petitionamend2.pdf - 2015-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as the perpetrator from a photographic lineup. ¶5 Mueller obtained the recordings from hallway cameras
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222252 - 2018-10-16
as the perpetrator from a photographic lineup. ¶5 Mueller obtained the recordings from hallway cameras
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222252 - 2018-10-16