Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 64779 for records.
Search results 1311 - 1320 of 64779 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The record before this court on appeal is incomplete. Among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184646 - 2017-09-21
below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The record before this court on appeal is incomplete. Among other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184646 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joseph M. Rucker
the juvenile court and probation records of two alleged accomplices; (4) erroneously exercised discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10993 - 2005-03-31
the juvenile court and probation records of two alleged accomplices; (4) erroneously exercised discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10993 - 2005-03-31
City of Madison v. Cynthia J. Vernon
to grant a motion for reconsideration once the record of the case had been certified to the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14295 - 2005-03-31
to grant a motion for reconsideration once the record of the case had been certified to the municipal court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14295 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for twenty-five years from recording and automatically extended for ten-year periods thereafter “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53348 - 2014-09-15
for twenty-five years from recording and automatically extended for ten-year periods thereafter “unless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53348 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39785 - 2009-08-19
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39785 - 2009-08-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39785 - 2014-09-15
which the repeater enhancement was based was no longer “of record” at the time of sentencing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39785 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of Directors; and to allow the members to inspect and copy certain Society records. ¶4 The Society
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32526 - 2011-06-14
of Directors; and to allow the members to inspect and copy certain Society records. ¶4 The Society
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32526 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Hospital medical records. The officer testified she did not receive a paper copy of the victim’s medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
Hospital medical records. The officer testified she did not receive a paper copy of the victim’s medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181349 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 8
. ¶3 On August 6, 2018, the trial court conducted the arraignment hearing.1 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618552 - 2023-03-08
. ¶3 On August 6, 2018, the trial court conducted the arraignment hearing.1 The record reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618552 - 2023-03-08
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 14-04 Second Amended Rule Proposal (with cover sheet)
a reference to how a clerk should certify a record that has been redacted. In SCR 71.04(13) (last page
/supreme/docs/1404petitionamend2.pdf - 2015-06-22
a reference to how a clerk should certify a record that has been redacted. In SCR 71.04(13) (last page
/supreme/docs/1404petitionamend2.pdf - 2015-06-22